Conflict checks before the facts: a names-first screening script.
Capture the adverse party before a single case detail. A simple gate that keeps a bad call from becoming a bad day.
A difficult intake mistake is collecting detailed facts before checking for a possible conflict. Once a caller has told you about the other driver, unwinding it is awkward at best and a problem at worst. The fix is order: names before facts.
The gate, in one step
Early in the call, before any details, collect the caller's name and the name of the party they are in a dispute with. Check that adverse party against your conflict list. Only then move into what happened.
Checking names before case facts are discussed helps the firm stop early when a possible conflict appears.
What to say when it flags
If the check flags, stop. Do not take the facts. Tell the caller the firm needs to confirm it can help and will call right back. That is honest, it protects the caller, and it protects the firm.
Building it into every call
- Ask for both names first, on every call.
- Run the check before the mechanism-of-injury questions.
- Log the adverse party on the matter for the firm to verify.
- Route a flagged call to a person, not to a booking.
Using the same names-first sequence on every call gives the firm a consistent point to check for a possible conflict.
Conflict-of-interest and confidentiality rules vary by jurisdiction. This is general information, not legal advice.
Field notes from the team that builds and runs 24/7 AI intake for personal-injury firms.
Hear it handle a representative intake call.
Bring your intake questions; we'll show where names are collected and when detailed facts begin.
Book the 20-minute demo →