Vetted Cases
Comparison

AI vs a human answering service: a practical comparison.

Answering services and AI intake vary widely. Compare the actual scope: hours, screening questions, conflict workflow, booking, pricing, and when a person takes over.

What matters
Vetted Cases
Human answering service
24/7 coverage and concurrent-call handling
Every call, one ring
Coverage and queues vary by provider
Personal-injury qualification
Full PI intake script
Takes a message
Conflict check before case facts
On every call
No
Incident-date review flag
Automatic
No
Warm transfer to your attorney
Live, with context
Sometimes, extra fee
Books the consult
On your calendar
Rarely
Cost model
Build + monthly, no per-call fee
Per call / per minute
Structured data to your CRM
Every matter
Manual, if at all
Where a human still wins

Where people still matter.

A caller in crisis, a complicated fact pattern, or any situation requiring professional judgment should reach a person. The intake assistant's job is to gather approved information and follow the firm's transfer or booking rules, while the lawyer makes legal decisions.

Compare the approaches in a live demo.

Book 20 minutes. Hear a representative injury call handled two ways, then see how the intake flow would be configured for your firm.

Book the 20-minute demo →